I will fully admit that this suggestion is self-serving, because I was a guest co-host on the episode I’m recommending.
Normally, Almost Educational consists of two educators (both teachers in the US) who discuss various topics – thought experiments, alternate realities, “drafts” where they go back and forth picking personalities for different things – that they aren’t able to discuss in the classroom.
It’s a lot of fun and worth listening to. Patrick (who I’d call the “main” host) also has a lot of guest hosts on when Dennis isn’t available. I’m one of those guests! This was my first time as a guest on his show, and I hope it’s not the last.
We talked about Baseball, hence the title of the episode: “Canadian Baseball“. The episode spurred from an off-the-cuff Twitter dialog between the two of us talking about which MLB teams we would contract. It was a lot of fun and the only thing I’ll reveal is that we both revived the Montreal Expos.
Before I get to my next recommendation, I want to share some thoughts about podcast episode backlogs (which I’m experiencing a lot right now). I recently listened to an episode of Reading Glasses that talked about not forging ahead with a book you don’t like simply because you feel like you need to finish a book once you’ve started it. The truth is, you don’t. You can put it down.
The same is true for podcast episodes. I often clear out episodes I know I’m not interested in, but yesterday I stopped listening to an episode midway through because I wasn’t interested in it. If you have a problem with too many episodes to listen to, keep this “tip” in your toolbox.
Transporter Room 3
Transporter Room 3 is a Star Trek podcast that I’ve listened to since its inception (circa 2011). The hosts don’t take Trek too seriously, and like to poke fun at it (and themselves). It’s entertaining and their episodes aren’t too long.
I’m highlighting this one not only because they have an entertaining and thorough discussion about the episode, but they also have some insightful talk about Star Trek: Picard. This discussion was prompted by a well-written fan email leveling a complaint against the show (and “new Trek” in general).
Overall a great episode, and you can also dive into their back catalog for some fun listening. They don’t cover anything in order (except for Discovery, and Picard) so you can jump around and listen as you please.
Most people are likely going stir-crazy while not being able to do what they normally like to. And you know what? That’s okay. After you get past watching TV for the thousandth hour, you’ll start doing some different things around the house.
And maybe that different thing is listening to Podcasts. I’ve been listening to Podcasts for well over a decade now, so I have my favourites (and occasionally new favourites pop into my subscription list). I thought I would write a few posts to share some specific episodes that I’ve listened to lately that I enjoyed. Most podcast players allow you to listen to specific episodes without having to subscribe to them, so don’t feel obligated to do so – although you may not be disappointed if you do.
The Crazy One Podcast
I’m 99% sure I’ve written about The Crazy One Podcast in the past, but in case you’re not familiar with it, it’s a podcast hosted by Stephen Gates. Gates is basically a creative person who talks a lot about creativity in various forms – I was introduced to him in the context of his thoughts around leadership. You can read more about him here: http://stephengates.com/
The episode I found particularly enlightening was number 94: The Lost Art of Boredom. This one came at just the right time – now is a time when a lot of people are bored, right? But the gist of it is that with all the tech and distractions surrounding us, we’re not bored anymore.
Gates suggests that “boredom feeds creativity” and I don’t disagree with him. Often when we find ourselves ‘bored’, we need to be creative with what we do to fill the time. Often, too, that’s when ideas come to us (when our minds aren’t occupied by something else).
I don’t want to give away the entire episode, but Gates also implores listeners to “impose boredom back into your schedule.” Take some time to shut out the distractions that keep us from being bored. You might be surprised to find out how creative you might become.
I finally recorded a new podcast episode for The Slow Reader! It was becoming a chore and Not At All Fun to read, and I got to the point where I almost stopped the podcast. But I didn’t want to do that. Instead I changed up the format a bit.
I’m not the happiest with this episode, but I’m satisfied enough with it. The only thing I wish I had done better was editing in the music. I honestly did not spend that much time on it, and it shows.
Here’s the episode, plus show notes below.
Catching up on several books that I’ve read in the last two months, in addition to covering off what I’m reading now and what I’ll be reading in the future. Stay safe, stay healthy!
Yesterday I finally released the review I wrote / recorded for The MVP Machine (by Ben Lindburgh and Travis Sawchik). The audio and un-revised transcripts are below! I also decided to paste the show notes because I made a few revisions on the fly while recording, and didn’t include podcast list or music notes in the written version.
My review of The MVP Machine, a book that covers the latest evolution of player development in Major League Baseball; the book is written by Travis Sawchik and Ben Lindburgh.
Welcome to the Slow Reader – a podcast about books. I’m Steve and in today’s episode I am reviewing The MVP Machine by Ben Lindbergh & Travis Sawchik.
About the book
Publish date: June 4, 2019
Back of the book summary:
Move over, Moneyball — a cutting-edge look at major league baseball’s next revolution: the high-tech quest to build better players.
As bestselling authors Ben Lindbergh and Travis Sawchik reveal in The MVP Machine, the Moneyball era is over. Fifteen years after Michael Lewis brought the Oakland Athletics’ groundbreaking team-building strategies to light, every front office takes a data-driven approach to evaluating players, and the league’s smarter teams no longer have a huge advantage in valuing past performance.
Lindbergh and Sawchik’s behind-the-scenes reporting reveals:
How the 2017 Astros and 2018 Red Sox used cutting-edge technology to win the World Series How undersized afterthoughts José Altuve and Mookie Betts became big sluggers and MVPs How polarizing pitcher Trevor Bauer made himself a Cy Young contender How new analytical tools have overturned traditional pitching and hitting techniques How a wave of young talent is making MLB both better than ever and arguably worse to watch Instead of out-drafting, out-signing, and out-trading their rivals, baseball’s best minds have turned to out-developing opponents, gaining greater edges than ever by perfecting prospects and eking extra runs out of older athletes who were once written off. Lindbergh and Sawchik take us inside the transformation of former fringe hitters into home-run kings, show how washed-up pitchers have emerged as aces, and document how coaching and scouting are being turned upside down. The MVP Machine charts the future of a sport and offers a lesson that goes beyond baseball: Success stems not from focusing on finished products, but from making the most of untapped potential.
So I hope you’ve at least gathered from the book summary that this is a book about Baseball. The last books about Baseball that I’ve read – that I can remember off the top of my head – include The Only Rule is It Has To Work (also co-authored by Ben Lindbergh), Moneyball, and books by Jonah Keri: The Extra 2% (a book covering the Tampa Bay Rays) and Up, Up, and Away!, a book about the Montreal Expos. There may be more that I’m leaving off the list, but I feel these are the most relevant anyway.
Moneyball is probably the one book that is mentioned the most throughout MVP Machine. With good reason, I think – because “moneyball” is also the term most quoted for what the Oakland A’s popularized in the early 2000’s when they couldn’t compete with the payrolls of teams like the Yankees or the Red Sox. But the advantage moneyball provided – which was, in essence, about finding undervalued players and getting the most out of them – is no longer there because most teams have latched onto the analytics revolution.
The Extra 2%, on the other hand, was about how teams could squeeze extra value out of what they had to work with – and not just about finding undervalued talent – as well as properly managing your assets. The negative connotation around The Extra 2% is that the Rays are known for being notoriously cheap and stretching dollars in the guise of being “revolutionary”. If you combine the content of Moneyball and The Extra 2% though, that’s kind of what you get with The MVP Machine.
Before I go any further, however…
My Reading Timeline
I began reading this October 28 2019, and finished reading it December 17, 2019. In total, this meant it took me just over 1 and a half months (50 days) to read the book. I should point out that I had a break between November 17th and December 14th when my library loan ended, and I also had to stop to read a new book (Warlight, which I covered back in December).
Unfortunately, I can’t provide any detailed statistics because my reading took place between a physical book and an eBook, so with different formats it’s tough to figure out what my stats were.
Since this is a non-fiction book, and I’m writing this review almost a month removed from actually finishing it, I thought I would just go with a more straight-forward review. I didn’t really have any questions leading into reading the book; I knew more or less what it was about and I was very interested in the content. I’m not a huge baseball watcher – I mean, I like baseball, I just don’t devote a lot of time to it as some people do. I also don’t read a lot of articles about baseball, though I try to keep up to date with a handful of baseball podcasts (my list at the end of this episode).
With that said, I was peripherally aware of some of the “real life” content of this book. What I mean by that is I did read some articles here and there talking about players changing their swings, trying different things. For example, I remember reading about J.D. Martinez of the Boston Red Sox talking about how he started to swing up at the ball a few years back; in general, that’s what I’m hearing – a lot of players are trying to put the ball in the air these days more than anything else, which is partly what’s leading to an increase in Home Runs.
What I’m getting at here is that I have not been unaware of the idea presented in this book: that professional baseball players are actively trying to improve upon their talent. What was new to me was the history of all of this, dating back to names like Branch Rickey of the Brooklyn Dodgers; or the extent to which some teams and some individual players (like Cleveland’s Trevor Bauer) are going to go about these improvements.
One thing I particularly enjoyed about this book was that it wasn’t just a bunch of charts and numbers thrown in my face. There was some narrative involved, and authors Lindbergh and Sawchik did a fairly good job of preventing the material from coming across as boring. Surprisingly, I really enjoyed the passages where the authors would describe a specific at-bat, one pitch at a time. In theory, that sounds like something that could be really boring: first pitch – swinging strike, fastball. Second pitch – Ball, outside. And so on. But they were able to put me in the time and place of the game they were describing. Maybe this is just something that I found interesting and others didn’t, but it definitely worked for me.
What this also did for me was get me excited about baseball again. For a little bit, other than following the local indy ball team the Ottawa Champions, I haven’t really been following baseball all that closely. I still don’t know what players are on what team right now, as there’s been a lot of movement in this year’s off-season; but reading The MVP Machine has me excited to watch some regular season ball (although I suppose it helps that we just got a big 4K TV over the Christmas holidays).
So, to sum up, I had a great time reading The MVP Machine. I learned a lot of different things that weren’t just related to baseball – I’ll expand on that in a little bit – and the information was not presented in a dry manner in any way. I felt that part in particular was very important, as presenting statistics can be potentially very boring.
So What Did I Learn?
Obviously, I learned about how many baseball teams – and specifically individual players such as Trevor Bauer – are embracing growth mindsets and trying to improve their talent rather than just “finding good players”. The main thing that I got out of it is that baseball teams all are using advanced analytics to find great players for less money; because of that, the advantage that teams like the Oakland Athletics enjoyed for a few years is gone. The new advantage is in player development when teams realized that their players were capable of so much more.
But I also learned that a lot of what baseball teams and management are doing is incredibly similar to things that I learned last year participating in a new people leader course. I already mentioned “growth mindset” – that’s a huge term bandied about lately. I’m struggling a little to remember everything I read and wanted to mention, but suffice it to say that you could give this book to anyone aspiring to improve themselves in their career – any career – and they would get some good information out of it. You could really take out the specific statistical mentions related to baseball and you’d still get a great book.
I should also mention that while I was reading this book, details of the Houston Astros cheating scandal were starting to trickle out (and as I type this review, the rulings from Major League Baseball have since been handed out). Interestingly, I read the chapters about Houston before a lot of the information came out. The picture I got of the Houston management was not pretty and I decided fairly quickly that this is not a front office I would want to work for if I had my pick of teams.
I can’t say that there’s a team that was presented in the book that I would put at the top of my list, but it’s good to know that I can recognize the kind of work environment that I absolutely want to avoid. Just because it’s something semi-glamourous like working in sports doesn’t make it a fantastic place.
I think this is a great book that helps to cover off some of what is going on in the world of Baseball in terms of player development and a bit of insight into how players move throughout organizations. It also touches on some of the history of the game (which was really neat – it was especially fun to learn that Branch Rickey was famous for more than just employing Jackie Robinson). If you also get a chance to see some of the behind-the-scenes material, which includes a short commentary audio track where the authors talk about the book, I recommend doing that as well.
I am slowly making my way through The Mandalorian. We were waiting until we got a new big-screen TV to get the most out of the show, which we did around Christmas. It’s a great show so far, and we’re only two episodes into it. Other than that, I’ve been taking a bit of a break from consuming content. I’m starting to get myself back into things so in future episodes I’m sure I’ll have something new to talk about.
Thanks for listening to The Slow Reader – next episode I will review the Star Wars novel Master and Apprentice. Spoiler alert: I liked it. It’s probably going to be another short one though, because I finished reading it after Christmas but before New Year’s. I’ll share some thoughts about The Rise of Skywalker in that episode too. See you next time!
I posted the review for Warlight last week on my feed for The Slow Reader (https://slow-reader.pinecast.co). Here’s the text! Please excuse any minor typos – I didn’t really write it to be read, but to be heard.
Warlight by Michael Ondaatje
Welcome to the Slow Reader – a podcast about books. I’m Steve and in today’s episode I am reviewing Warlight by Michael Ondaatje.
About the book
Publish date: May 8, 2018
Back of the book summary:
In a narrative as mysterious as memory itself – at once both shadowed and luminous – Warlight is a vivid, thrilling novel of violence and love, intrigue and desire. It is 1945, and London is still reeling from the Blitz and years of war. 14-year-old Nathaniel and his sister, Rachel, are apparently abandoned by their parents, left in the care of an enigmatic figure named The Moth. They suspect he might be a criminal, and grow both more convinced and less concerned as they get to know his eccentric crew of friends: men and women with a shared history, all of whom seem determined now to protect, and educate (in rather unusual ways) Rachel and Nathaniel. But are they really what and who they claim to be? A dozen years later, Nathaniel begins to uncover all he didn’t know or understand in that time, and it is this journey – through reality, recollection, and imagination – that is told in this magnificent novel.
Warlight is a book that, because it’s by a renown Canadian author, is going to be found prominently displayed at most large bookstores in Canada, so that’s how it first appeared on my radar. I’ve never read Ondaatje before (even though I was supposed to read In the Skin of a Lion in university), so it didn’t immediately go on my to-read list. It wasn’t until I read the back-of-the-book description that made me want to read it. I also knew that it was critically acclaimed and on several book prize lists. So that’s what really sealed the deal and prompted me to add it to my library hold list.
The book has different chapter headings, but they’re not numbered. I might not have had a good idea of how the chapters were divided, reading an eBook copy. Unfortunately, in preparing this review, I didn’t have a physical copy to rely on and can’t really elaborate further. But the way it worked in the eBook was that the novel was split into 3 overall parts, and within those parts were chapters (with headings such as “Wildfowling”), and within those were other, smaller breaks.
I found it really easy to read full chapters at a time, as they were all small chunks. It made for some easily digestible reading sessions – and as I’ll elaborate on in a little bit, this was really helpful in trying to decipher the book.
My Reading Timeline
I started reading the book on November 13th, and finished reading it on November 28th. That’s 16 days, which is quick for my standards – but the reason for that was because it was a library eBook that I had no opportunity to renew.
My copy had 272 or 292 pages (depending on my font settings), so it was a short book to move through as well. Because I read it in my Kobo Clara HD, I was able to get some good stats: it took my 8.6 hours to read, with my average minutes read per session at 6 minutes, and an average of 0.9 pages per minute.
Questions to Answer
I didn’t come up with any questions before I started reading Warlight, mostly because I had to just dive right into the book. The summary I read earlier is actually a fairly good indication as to what the book is about. But to really understand it, I need to delve into spoiler territory. From this point out, while I won’t get into every detail, I recommend reading the book before continuing with the podcast.
What’s the book really about?
This is a complicated question, and a complicated answer. On the surface, I don’t think the book is “about” anything in the sense of conflict. It really feels like it’s three different stories mashed together. It starts out as what appears to be a coming of age story, but at the end of part one, it becomes a spy story when there’s an attempted kidnapping of Nathaniel and his sister. But given the details weaved throughout the first part, you can see that it also has always been a spy story. In Part Two, it becomes a fact-finding mission – Nathanial as an adult trying to uncover secrets about his mother. And the third part is his mother’s story – but in the end, all three parts are woven together and tied up neatly.
I’m not going to lie, I had to do a little bit of extra reading to try to pick apart this book. There’s a section in the Warlight Wikipedia entry devoted to “interpretation”. I’m grateful for it, because it helped distill some of the more confusing aspects of the story (and also helped inform my own interpretation of the book). There’s a New York Times review by Penelope Lively where she suggests the theme of the novel is that “the past never remains in the past”, and “the present reconstructs the past”. I think this interpretation is bang on – and fits with some of the observations of the main character at the end of the story.
When I think about it personally, I can’t help but come to the same conclusion about the present “reconstructing” the past. It’s really easy to look back at past events and remember them in a different light. “Hindsight is 20/20” is a saying for a reason, after all.
Another part of the novel that I picked up on, and confirmed in Lively’s interpretation, that the narration is deliberately vague and not revealing. The term “warlight” is mentioned several times throughout the story, referring to periods in the war where England would create blackouts to make it difficult for German bombers to see the landscape at night. There’s also a point in the novel describing a small village outside of London where during the war, they removed all signposts from the countryside to make it virtually impossible for anyone on foot to navigate.
Ondaatje does this in the novel as well – he makes it deliberately difficult to navigate the narration and follow along, forcing us to fill in the gaps ourselves with a close reading. There’s a quote from the main character: “I know how to fill in a story from a grain of sand or a fragment of discovered truth.”
This really made my reading sessions somewhat overwhelming and hard to get through. I mentioned earlier that my reading sessions were short and easily broken up, but there were times where I just couldn’t keep reading because of how much information is just thrown at you to try and digest. It’s very difficult to follow and you really need to concentrate on what you’re reading.
Highlights from the Book
I highlighted a lot of lines from the book – for various reasons, these passages spoke to me. Unfortunately, I neglected to get the page numbers or which chapter they’re from before I returned the book, so it’ll have to remain a mystery to you.
“Nothing lasts. Not even literary or artistic fame protects worldly things around us”
– I’m not entirely sure why I highlighted this line. I think maybe I picked this out as one of the underlying themes of the novel. I don’t think that’s the overall message I got after finishing the book though.
“It was strange to consider their world being organized in such a godlike way by a woman who was remembering less and less of her own universe”
– This was referring to a bee colony and a woman from, whom Nathanial was buying a house. I just enjoyed the contrast displayed in this short sentence, which at the same time made a somewhat sad statement about the mental state of the woman it was describing.
“In any case, this was the government job I had enigmatically referred to that afternoon in Mrs. Malakite’s garden while the bees moved uncertainly in their hives and she had forgotten who I was.”
– There’s nothing particularly special about this line – I just highlighted it because it reminded me of how we sometimes tell stories. Something mentioned in passing gets elaborated on further. There was a lot of that happening in the novel.
“There was a hasty, determined destruction of evidence by all sides”
– The destruction of documents that was being described by Ondaatje put in my mind the image of the various Ministries in 1984.
“In this post-war world twelve years later, it felt to some of us, our heads bent over the files brought to us daily, that it was no longer possible to see who held a correct moral position”
– I think this might be referring to the kinds of atrocities committed on both sides of the war. Part of what Ondaatje illustrates in the novel is that we have this idea of the “good guys” winning the war, but – alongside the previous quote about destroying evidence – as his mother put it in the novel, “sins were various” no matter which side you look at.
“She was not in her right mind, of course, then. She was exhausted. A seizure had been activated in her and she was probably never clear about the details of what had happened”
– The fact that Nathanial’s sister, Rachel, had seizures in the novel turned out not to be an important detail. It helped to weave some minor points together in the story; but what made me highlight this was that I recently experienced a seizure for the first time. This part of the description: “…she was probably never clear about the details of what had happened” resonates with me completely. One minute I was cooking breakfast, and the next thing I remember after is waking up in the back of an ambulance. I don’t know what happened other than what was told to me.
“Do we eventually become what we are originally meant to be?”
– This idea of pre-determined fates was explored a little bit in the novel. I’m not sure that the question was ever really answered. But personally, I believe that yes, we all have some sort of destiny and life exerts itself to put is in a particular path. We have some control over what direction we go, but ultimately, we end up where we’re supposed to be.
““So how long are you here? What do you do with yourself?”
It felt to me that both questions, side by side, showed a lack of interest.”
– I laughed a little at this quote. The way these questions were written, that’s exactly the tone I imagined. They feel like small talk made to say something and doesn’t require attentive listening.
“But above all, most of all, how much damage did I do”
– To be honest, I’m not sure why I picked this line out of the book. I think it was Nathanial realizing who he was and what his past meant to him and others.
“We are foolish as teenagers. We say wrong things, do not know how to be modest, or less shy. We judge easily. But the only hope given us, although only in retrospect, is that we change”
– This is a very bleak outlook on how we act as youth. Still, it’s fairly accurate. I think we all acknowledge that we do stupid things in our youth (from teenagers on up including even our 20’s). As adults, we look down on teenagers and chalk up their actions to “they’re just teenagers”. So I guess I highlighted this line for truth. As for the previous line – I think it followed this line so now I understand it in context. Nathanial is asking how much damage he did as a teenager – and I suppose, asking himself if he changed.
I liked the book – I wasn’t really bored while reading, except for a few places here and there. But this was not an easy read, by any means, and I really feel like I need a palate cleanser in between. Luckily I have a couple of lighter books on the go that help in that regard – the only problem being that I feel the need to take a short reading break.
On Goodreads I rated Warlight 3 out of 5 stars. After reading through I like to read other reviews, and a lot of what I saw matched my opinion. It’s a solid book, but Part Three suffers a little compared to the rest of the book. This is where it really slows down, when Nathanial starts to recount his mother’s childhood and how she learned to become a spy.
I didn’t really think it fit with the rest of the book – I’m not sure I even understood how Nathanial knew all of these details. I think maybe he was making a lot of it up based on small bits of information he learned over the years. That could very well be what happened here. But to me it felt very unimportant to the overall story and I just wanted to breeze through it.
I recommend the novel, with the caveat that you should give yourself time to get through it. Don’t rush through it as I felt I had to.
What’s Next on the Podcast
So, what’s next for The Slow Reader? I have two books that I put on hold while I read Warlight: The MVP Machine and Master and Apprentice. The latter is a Star Wars novel set before The Phantom Menace. I intend to finish these books before the end of the year, but I’m not sure if I will get to the recording process before then. I anticipate that you’ll see a new episode in January 2020.
After those books I think I want to get through some shorter material, so I’ll have a look on my shelf and pick out some thin reading.
The music at the start of this episode was called Labile Polvere, recorded by Mattia Vlad Morleo. Find out more at Jamendo.com.
If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to check out previous episodes and books at https://slow-reader.pinecast.co. Share this with other people and leave me a comment on Twitter, @stephen_g. Thanks for listening!
Wow! It’s been a while. I dismantled my studio, cleaned it up, and put it back together again since the last episode. I was going to record two today (Slow Reader + Alternative Airwaves) but I opted for just The Slow Reader. I might do Alternative Airwaves later this week.
I like the way this turned out; I’m pretty much resigned to not worrying about the length of the podcast. It’s going to be a sub-10 minute show. There’s a niche for that and I’m filling it.
I just finished (yesterday) typing out my script/outline for the final podcast episode about The Saturday Night Ghost Club; I still need to go back over it and give it a little polish, but I’m happy with it in general. I wasn’t sure how I wanted to structure the episode, but all of a sudden I got an idea yesterday afternoon and just got going.
In a perfect world I would have had this done and published as of August 8th, but I didn’t want to publish something sub-par. I’m not sure when I’ll get this episode done, but I think it will be good when I finish it.
Got a new episode out! On time! I recorded it in Halifax while on vacation, so the sound quality is slightly off from what I usually cobble together.
I’m very excited to start a new book! This wasn’t entirely intended (influenced only by when I received the book from the library), but The Saturday Night Ghost Club (by Craig Davidson) starts today with episodes 1-4, right when most other people are watching Stranger Things 3 (I’ve only seen the first season + the first episode of season 2 so far). This is a spooky book, and really good so far. So dive in with me!
I haven’t even completed the pre-production on the final episode for “Gone” (catch up on the book by following the Podcasts category on the blog) and I’m already excited for it. I’m excited for me, and I’m excited to have people listen to it. Because I think it’s going to be the best one yet (for this book). I’ve been really up & down with my own personal reaction to the podcast and how I’ve produced it, but I’ve been taking in everything I’ve done for it so far and internalized how I want to make the podcast sound better.
I’m not going to release any details – because there’s still two more episodes for the book left (tomorrow, and 14 days from now); but I will give you a little bit of behind the scenes to chew on.
This is a new approach to podcasting for me; I usually just take notes and improvise as I go on the mic, because I don’t like working with a script. While this isn’t exactly a script, and I deviate from what I write from time-to-time, I figured that doing a solo show needed a bit more structure and that doing it unscripted would be harder.
Indeed, even partially scripting it is more difficult than I thought (for example, for an episode I thought would definitely be longer than 15 minutes, I came in under 10). But I’m having a good time doing it. As I said to Vanessa last night, I’m doing a lot of the work for the podcast in small chunks, because I don’t want to burn myself out and have it actually feel like work.
As I mentioned earlier, I’ve been trying to make the podcast sound better as I continue through the books and reading that I’m doing. It bugs me a little bit that most of my episodes are still quite short – 10 minutes or less. I feel like I’m not putting as much effort as I could be into the episodes, so that’s mainly why it’s bugging me. So that’s why this episode coming up in a couple of weeks has me excited – like I said, I’m still doing the pre-production work and have a lot to put together, but the material I’ve written already is some of the best I’ve done for this podcast to date.
Something I’m struggling with at the moment is a lack of time, though. I’ve finished Gone, but haven’t picked a new book to read yet – so while I have plans for an episode or two in between Gone and the next book, I don’t know how all of that will work out yet. If I sit down and think about it, I likely have a lot of time to puzzle it out. I definitely want something planned to release so I don’t get caught with several weeks without a new episode again.
I’ve got a few notes and ideas for the next book and how to cover it a bit differently. Some of that will go into the final chapters of Gone; but for the most part you won’t see a change until the start of the next book.
Thanks for reading / listening. Let me know if you are listening to the podcast!
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.